On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 14:58, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > >> +1 provided that it's shown in the syntax display name that this is >> still in an experimental state. > > It's already displayed like this thomas.
Yes i know, it's more a reason why i vote +1 than a request > > Thanks > -Vincent > >> >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:10, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'd like to include xwiki/2.1 in the list of available syntaxes by default >>> for 2.6RC1. >>> >>> Of course the default syntax remains xwiki/2.0. >>> >>> The rationale is: >>> * Get people to know it exist and try it out as early as possible to >>> provide feedback >>> >>> Note that it's marked (experimental) in the syntax combo box list so it >>> should be enough to let people know about its status. >>> >>> Here's my +1 >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
