Btw we should tag as "experimental" other features like the extension manager (beta is probably not the right naming actually), as well as user directory, etc.
Gregory GUENEAU XWiki Chief Strategy Officer +33 6 07 01 70 65 [email protected] -from my iPad- On 2 nov. 2010, at 15:54, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 as long as it's marked experimental. > > For the future, when the syntax is stable, what migration path do we > offer ? An option to automatically migrate all 2.0 content to 2.1 ? > > Also when changing syntax in the panel, should we provide specific > migrators to migrate a page from 1.0 directly to 2.1 like we do from > 2.0 to 2.1 ? from 2.0 to 2.1 ? (this one probably is not needed) > > Jerome. > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to include xwiki/2.1 in the list of available syntaxes by default >> for 2.6RC1. >> >> Of course the default syntax remains xwiki/2.0. >> >> The rationale is: >> * Get people to know it exist and try it out as early as possible to provide >> feedback >> >> Note that it's marked (experimental) in the syntax combo box list so it >> should be enough to let people know about its status. >> >> Here's my +1 >> >> WDYT? >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
