Also I think I'd prefer using the latest version from derby rather than the repackaged version by Oracle...
-Vincent On May 20, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > > On May 20, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > >> Hi devs, >> >> Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change >> our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb. >> >> I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb >> and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the >> only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so >> using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same >> features. >> >> WDYT ? > > I'm not 100% sure. Is javadb available in all JDKs? Isn't it only avail in > the Oracle JDK? > > Also is it avail in the JRE? > > Thanks > -Vincent > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
