And I'm not yet 100% convinced of Derby vs H2. H2 is a potential contender I think too.
Would need some pros/cons of each. -Vincent On May 20, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > Also I think I'd prefer using the latest version from derby rather than the > repackaged version by Oracle... > > -Vincent > > On May 20, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > >> >> On May 20, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >> >>> Hi devs, >>> >>> Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change >>> our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb. >>> >>> I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb >>> and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the >>> only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so >>> using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same >>> features. >>> >>> WDYT ? >> >> I'm not 100% sure. Is javadb available in all JDKs? Isn't it only avail in >> the Oracle JDK? >> >> Also is it avail in the JRE? >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
