On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:50, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:38, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On May 20, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >> >>> Hi devs, >>> >>> Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change >>> our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb. >>> >>> I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb >>> and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the >>> only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so >>> using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same >>> features. >>> >>> WDYT ? >> >> I'm not 100% sure. Is javadb available in all JDKs? Isn't it only avail in >> the Oracle JDK? > > From what I understood when java6 has been released it's part of java > 6 standard, At least I never seen anything suggesting that it was only > in Sun/Oracle implementation.
Just checked on Ubuntu and javadb is not part of sun-java6-jre so I guess that means it's the same pretty much everywhere. So this IDEA become -1 for me :) > >> >> Also is it avail in the JRE? >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
