On 05/20/2011 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > Hi devs, > > Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change > our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb. > > I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb > and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the > only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so > using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same > features. >
I'd rather upgrade to a more recent version of HSQLDB. The authors were kind enough to solve a few bugs that were causing problems for us when upgrading an older database. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
