On 08/12/2011 01:47 PM, Eduard Moraru wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Mortagne > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu<[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving >>>> stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ? >>>>> >>>>> Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them >> ASAP? >>>> >>>> I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We >>>> need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired >>>> organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention >> the >>>> "retired" in a top level README? >>>> >>>> >>> I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project >> in >>> its own repository. >>> >>> I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on >>> xwiki-contrib. >>> >>> Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners. >>> >>> I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in >>> one big repository, or each project separated? >> >> Ok for one sandbox repository, we can always move some of them later >> to their own project > > > Not sure about it, but when moving them to their own repo (if needed), we > have to copy/paste outside of git and the history is lost, right?
No, git allows to extract a sub-path out of a repository with all its history. > Thanks, > Eduard > > >> and yes as Vincent said they don't really need to >> be in separated repositories since we don't release them and they >> don't have separated rights. >> >>> -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
