On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 9, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > >> On 08/08/2011 11:27 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>> Hi Devs, >>> >>> I've updated http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ >> >> I don't like this: >> <version>See >> https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/blob/master/pom.xml</version> >> >> Hasty people could just copy/paste it as it is. How about putting that >> as a comment: >> >> <!-- See https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/blob/master/pom.xml for >> the latest available version --> >> <version>3.1</version> >> >> As a minor remark, it's repeated quite often that "your project can be >> used as a dependency by other projects", so it could imply that >> contributions are generally modules/libraries, and not stand-alone >> applications. > > I haven't touched any of those. They were there before. Please feel free to > improve them. > >>> I've also updated >>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository > > I've also just added some information about the SVN GitHub view: > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository#HGettingSources > >> "XWiki is an ObjectWeb's project" is wrong, it should be OW2 (fixed it >> already). >> >>> Please review it and let me know if it's ok. >>> >>> I've removed several notions that don't make sense anymore like sandbox, >>> personal directory space. >> >> Well, we could still say that github allows anyone to host its own >> projects, without the need to be accepted on xwiki-contrib, and that any >> repository can be later moved under the xwiki-contrib umbrella. > > Yes I agree. Can you add it? > >>> There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff >>> from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ? >> >> Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP? > > I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need > to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization > on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the "retired" in a > top level README?
Would be nicer to separate active contributions from retired projects IMO. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
