+1 for [Contrib][<Project>]

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Then [Contrib][<Project>] I guess.
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Anca Luca <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Actually I don't like the idea of having the name of the application
> itself
> > and not a unique keyword because it's not easy to have filters in the
> mail
> > client for all the names of the applications on contrib (I cannot imagine
> > how I would create these filters). With a single keyword filters are
> easier
> > to do.
> >
> > Let's please decide quickly on this, because I see there is already
> contrib
> > related activity that I am missing...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anca
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > > On 08 Apr 2016, at 11:43, Anca Luca <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Hello all,
> >> > >
> >> > > Since http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/jrug6cbbqpia5bx4 (but not
> only)
> >> > the
> >> > > rule says that we should discuss contrib related stuff with the
> >> > community.
> >> > > In my case, I cannot manage to follow all the mails on the
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > > (because they are a lot) but I would be particularly interested of
> not
> >> > > missing the ones about contrib extensions.
> >> >
> >> > Since the dev rules for xwiki contrib are now the same as for xwiki
> core
> >> > (i.e. dev.xwiki.org), I’m not sure if it makes sense to differentiate
> >> > proposals. Maybe you could just filter mails with "[Proposal]" and
> >> "[VOTE]”?
> >> >
> >> > > However, today, I don't know how
> >> > > to differentiate them, I would need to read all [email protected] to
> not
> >> > miss
> >> > > one.
> >> > >
> >> > > There are multiple solutions that I can propose for this, please
> let me
> >> > > know what you think:
> >> > > 1/ have a contrib mailing list
> >> >
> >> > I feel that xwiki-contrib might be large enough now to warrant a
> mailing
> >> > list but maybe not 2 (users and devs).
> >> >
> >> > However there are issues:
> >> >
> >> > * Notifications from jira. We could have a single [email protected]
> >> > mailing for everything related to contrib (users, devs,
> notifications).
> >> >
> >> > * Users don’t know if what they’re using from e.x.o is from Core or
> from
> >> > Contrib so they’d have a hard time choosing the right list from
> >> > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/MailingLists. For
> example
> >> > right now we have: "[email protected] : For questions about using
> XWiki,
> >> > using the XWiki API, suggestions for improvements, ideas, etc.”
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > 2/ have an alias for the contrib that would send on the same list,
> this
> >> > way
> >> > > we could filter by the "to" field
> >> > > 3/ have a convention about mails related to contrib (e.g. [Contrib]
> in
> >> > the
> >> > > subject) that would allow to filter
> >> >
> >> > This is probably the simplest ATM. The pros is that it wouldn’t create
> >> any
> >> > fragmentation between Contrib and Core, which is probably a good
> thing.
> >> >
> >> > > 4/ any other technical solution that I didn't think about that would
> >> > allow
> >> > > to automatically decide if a mail is about contrib or not, without
> >> > reading
> >> > > it :D
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > 1, 2 and even 4 are perfectly fine with me, 3 is a bit risky because
> >> > people
> >> > > might not follow conventions.
> >> > >
> >> > > What do you think?
> >> >
> >> > If we follow the direction that we’re trying to take, which is to
> have a
> >> > single large community (ie bring contrib and core together), I think
> the
> >> > best is to keep using the same lists as now but do a best effort of
> using
> >> > "[Contrib]” for mails related only to contrib stuff.
> >> >
> >>
> >> IMO contrib devs should be up to date with the changes in the platform
> and
> >> we should keep the communication tight with the platform. As we can see,
> >> many topics on contrib apps trace down to the platform and vice-versa.
> >>
> >> It would also not be very helpful for the project/community to do such a
> >> segregation, so I agree with Vincent.
> >>
> >> Since we are talking about contrib (which are devs and which have a
> guide
> >> to follow), as Thomas suggested, it would be a helpful idea to mention
> the
> >> app in the subject so that we can apply filters in the mail client,
> should
> >> we need them.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Eduard
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > -Vincent
> >> >
> >> > > Anca
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > devs mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devs mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to