On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Thank you for your votes.
>> >
>> > I have created a dedicated section for this step
>> >
>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleasePlans/ReleasePlanHelp#HGenerateCodeContributorslist
>> > and move it outside of the #HAnnouncementMail step. Currently we will
>> list
>> > the contributors only in the Release Notes.
>> >
>> > Since there is no current way now to automate getting the translators and
>> > testers, the section focused on code contributors. Maybe in the future we
>> > will add additional contributors if people are interested.
>>
>> Actually you could use
>> http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet
>> page for this.
>>
>> For example to get contributors since 8.1 (that was released on 24 May
>> 2016) you can use
>>
>> http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=20160525
>> (there is also a upperBound URL parameter).
>>
>>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> This could be used and looks very interesting.
> My only concern is that is listing 5 contributors (3 committers), while in
> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki82 there
> are 9 languages listed.
> So I guess something is wrong.

Not really. It just means people can contribute to several languages :)

For example you can see on http://l10n.xwiki.org home page that Edy
modifed at least nl and fr translations.

>
> Thanks,
> Caty
>
>
>
>> >
>> > I've updated the ReleasePlanTemplate and thanks to Marius who updated the
>> > ReleaseNoteTemplate.
>> >
>> > 8.2RC1 is the first release to list the contributors, check it out
>> > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki82RC1/
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Caty
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Thomas Mortagne <
>> [email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Alexandru Cotiuga
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > +1
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Alex
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
>> >> > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> +1
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> Marius
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]
>> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > +1 for contributors in the RN
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> > Eduard
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Vincent Massol <
>> [email protected]>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > > On 30 Jun 2016, at 18:40, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > > Hi Caty,
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > >> On 30 Jun 2016, at 18:32, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
>> >> >> > [email protected]>
>> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> > > >>
>> >> >> > > >> Hi,
>> >> >> > > >>
>> >> >> > > >> Since May 2015 we added in the Release Plan Help a step that
>> >> >> collects
>> >> >> > > the
>> >> >> > > >> list of code contributors of a release and lists them in the
>> >> >> > > announcement
>> >> >> > > >> mail.
>> >> >> > > >>
>> >> >> > > >> IMO this is a nice way to acknowledge and thank people that
>> are
>> >> >> > > >> contributing to XWiki.
>> >> >> > > >>
>> >> >> > > >> I want to propose that we add this contributors list in the
>> >> Release
>> >> >> > > Notes.
>> >> >> > > >> Release Notes are accessible when someone wants to downloads
>> >> XWiki
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> > > they
>> >> >> > > >> are also referenced as documentation when we close issues,
>> while
>> >> the
>> >> >> > > >> mailinglist are read just by the people that are subscribed.
>> >> >> > > >>
>> >> >> > > >> This visibility increase will be beneficial to thank
>> participants
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> > > also
>> >> >> > > >> maybe motivate other users to join the development.
>> >> >> > > >>
>> >> >> > > >> We could have this listing both in the Release Notes and the
>> >> >> > > Announcement
>> >> >> > > >> Mail, but I believe it's sufficient in the Release Notes (let
>> me
>> >> >> know
>> >> >> > if
>> >> >> > > >> you disagree).
>> >> >> > > >>
>> >> >> > > >> This change would imply:
>> >> >> > > >> - Change in the Release Plan to add this step
>> >> >> > > >> - Change in the Release Plan Help to document the process
>> >> >> > > >> - Change the Release Notes Template to add the Contributors
>> >> section
>> >> >> > > >>
>> >> >> > > >> The Release Manager would compute the code contributors, but
>> >> >> > additional
>> >> >> > > >> people could add themselves in case they contributed
>> >> translations or
>> >> >> > > >> performed tests (which usually happen after the release, so
>> it's
>> >> >> hard
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > > >> put this responsibility on the shoulders of the RM). Let me
>> know
>> >> if
>> >> >> > you
>> >> >> > > >> want the contributions to be exclusive to code contributions.
>> >> Also
>> >> >> > > having
>> >> >> > > >> other types of contributions means that we drop the
>> announcement
>> >> >> mail
>> >> >> > > >> listing since it could be incomplete.
>> >> >> > > >>
>> >> >> > > >> Let me know what you think.
>> >> >> > > >> My +1
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > > Big +1, it’s nicer to have the acks in the RNs.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Just to be clear my +1 is for:
>> >> >> > > - having the list of contributors to the release only in the RN
>> >> >> > > - I’m fine to also list other types of contributions
>> (translations,
>> >> >> etc).
>> >> >> > > The release process needs to explain how to find them and even
>> >> better
>> >> >> how
>> >> >> > > to automate getting them since we need to be careful that it
>> doesn’t
>> >> >> take
>> >> >> > > too long to gather them.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Thanks
>> >> >> > > -Vincent
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > > Thanks
>> >> >> > > > -Vincent
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > >> Thanks,
>> >> >> > > >> Caty
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> > > devs mailing list
>> >> >> > > [email protected]
>> >> >> > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> > devs mailing list
>> >> >> > [email protected]
>> >> >> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> devs mailing list
>> >> >> [email protected]
>> >> >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >> >>
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > devs mailing list
>> >> > [email protected]
>> >> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Thomas Mortagne
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> devs mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devs mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs



-- 
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to