Hi Ecaterina,
Hope you are well.

I was waiting for a complete review from Stephane.
There are some issues that he brought forward today. The application will
be released as soon as those issues are resolved.

Thanks,
Fawad

On Sun, Sep 1, 2019, 6:59 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <vali...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Fawad, can you make sure you've released the application on Contrib? I
> don't see a new version on GitHub or on e.x.o.
>
> Thanks,
> Caty
>
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 9:41 PM Fawad Ali <m.fawaadal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> Hope you are all well.
>>
>> Can I prepare my report on gist if that's all right?
>> The current application page feels more like a progress then a report.
>> I want to make the report minimal so that future readers can easily get
>> the idea without having to dive too much into details.
>> I will link all the necessary pages on the gist.
>>
>> Best,
>> Fawad
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:49 AM Fawad Ali <m.fawaadal...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ecaterina,
>>> Good to see you, hope you are doing well.
>>>
>>> Do you mean "org.webjars.bowergithub.9inpachi"? This is deployed on
>>> http://webjars.org
>>> I am not sure what could be wrong here. Even the leaflet dependency is
>>> not being installed in the latest tests. After installing Extension Manager
>>> Application into the test XWiki instance, I found that for Interactive Maps
>>> Application, the leaflet dependencies were labeled as "Provided" as opposed
>>> to "Installed" for other dependencies.
>>>
>>> The tests started failing around this commit
>>> https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-interactive-maps/commit/e3163a2552b9a900d4756867db336f0df43cc8f6
>>>
>>> I added leaflet-indoor.js as an attachment temporarily while I was
>>> waiting for the one deployed on webjars.org to function properly. I did
>>> remove it later on and added as a dependency but that doesn't seem to have
>>> solved the problem.
>>> I feel like this is some issue with the test itself and since I haven't
>>> made any changes to the test, the test frameworks might have been updated.
>>> I don't really know the cause since all was working fine before this.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Fawad
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:39 AM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
>>> vali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019, 17:04 Fawad Ali <m.fawaadal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> Hoping you a great week-end.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am having trouble testing my application because of some
>>>>> dependencies.
>>>>> This is the POM:
>>>>> https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-interactive-maps/blob/master/application-interactive-maps-ui/pom.xml
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the repositories are not found. Are the dependencies available
>>>> from Maven Central? I see you have your own group id. Is that artifact
>>>> published on any public repository or just local on your machine? Also,
>>>> make sure you publish everything for the Google requirements.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Caty
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Some of the leaflet dependencies are not being installed during
>>>>> testing. I am not sure why.
>>>>> When I open a page that uses leaflet libraries I get an error from
>>>>> requirejs that the library cannot be loaded. And there is no data when I 
>>>>> go
>>>>> to the url generated by $services.webjars.url() which leads me to believe
>>>>> that the dependency is not being installed as an extension.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I manually install the dependencies into my Wiki then it works fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you think there is something missing within the POM?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Fawad
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:42 PM Fawad Ali <m.fawaadal...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Stéphane, Ecaterina, all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stephane, this is the report that I mentioned before.
>>>>>> According to XWiki standards, what I plan to submit is a report based
>>>>>> on the format documented at
>>>>>> https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/GoogleSummerOfCode/DocumentingStudentProgress
>>>>>>  .
>>>>>> I updated this work progress halfway so half of it has to be done
>>>>>> still but I am positive I will be able to do it well before time. The
>>>>>> reason I chose to focus on the daily progress is that it gives more 
>>>>>> insight
>>>>>> to the daily activities performed on the project and the report can be
>>>>>> fairly easily created with using the daily progress as a reference.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have any other specific formats that you think will be better
>>>>>> then please let me know, we can follow that as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Fawad
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:52 PM Stéphane Laurière <
>>>>>> slauri...@xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Fawad, Hi Caty, Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since the GSoC deadline for work submission is approaching, I'm
>>>>>>> confident that all is in order for you Fawad but, also since it's my 
>>>>>>> first
>>>>>>> participatoin in the program, can I ask you to let us know what you 
>>>>>>> plan to
>>>>>>> publish, when and where, so that we make sure we're in tune and don't 
>>>>>>> miss
>>>>>>> any deadline or requirement?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The reference page I'm aware of is the one below, do you have any
>>>>>>> other?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/help/work-product
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are we in tune?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stéphane
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

Reply via email to