On 7 July 2016 at 16:09, Clayton Coleman <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Jul 7, 2016, at 4:24 AM, Jimmi Dyson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I've started minishift (fork of minikube) at >> https://github.com/jimmidyson/minishift if anyone wants to try it out. >> Will publish a first release of it later today or tomorrow hopefully. >> All feedback welcome - building is pretty simple, as long as you have >> the Go toolchain setup. >> >>> would this be able to run red hat's variation of docker ? >> >> Of course we can but the question is what benefit it brings? As this >> is only for single dev, easy getting started & play what Docker >> version is being used should be inconsequential to the ux. The only >> problem I can see with using RHT's Docker is the size of the ISO that >> minishift will need to download to start the VM. Right now this is >> ~36MB & this allows for really speedy startup (effectively no waiting >> for download). Switching to RHT's Docker & potentially CentOS/RHEL I >> would expect this to grow, which isn't terrible but would affect the >> ux somewhat. > > Not running the Red Hat Docker is a serious problem for OpenShift / > Kube, simply given the instability and gaps in upstream Docker. While > we're not running production workloads, it's really difficult to > certify and fix issues.
If someone can provide me with a URL to a simple tarball of RHT Docker if it's available I'm more than happy to use that in the ISO, but obviously don't want to have to include a full on yum install, etc which will bloat the ISO for little value in this case. > > I have trouble believing we can't match he size of that iso in practical > terms. > > >> >>> and how about openshift itself ? >> >> Minishift runs latest version of OpenShift (latest version at time of >> build embedded in the minishift binary for speedy start up time) & I >> am going to make the version configurable via flags which will >> download the specified release from github on startup, with caching >> for subsequent runs, etc. >> >> Thanks, >> Jimmi >> >>> On 6 July 2016 at 08:32, Hardy Ferentschik <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 06-Jul-2016 00:53, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>>> looks great. would this be able to run red hat's variation of docker ? and >>>> how about openshift itself ? >>> >>> My thinking as well. Might be worth investigating. A miniopenshift would >>> have >>> a great appeal. >>> >>> --Hardy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devtools mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools _______________________________________________ Devtools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
