On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Jimmi Dyson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7 July 2016 at 17:36, Pete Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hardy, Lala and the rest of the ADB team are going to investigate this > > over the next few weeks (whether we can replace the ADB infra with > > minishift). > > > > For the product version it must be based on something that we > > productise (which currently is RHEL or Atomic AFAIK) - doing it on top > > of something like Alpine is not an option. > > You can see what it's built from at > https://hub.docker.com/r/boot2docker/boot2docker/~/dockerfile/ . Don't > worry about the FROM debian:jessie - that's just to create the builder > image. You can see the minimal stuff it's actually installing in the > final ISO. > > > > > I would also worry about having a radically different upstream from > > the product version, as I think this can cause bugs, but I'll leave > > this one to the team to figure out :-) > > > > I've also asked Ian a few times if we can try to build smaller images > > - something to keep trying for ;-) > > I don't see why we couldn't have the equivalent of boot2docker.iso > image that minikube uses: basically a kernel & docker.... that's it. > Sure we can use a RHEL/CentOS kernel, right? Just please not the whole > RHEL install ;) Agreed. I think Pete and I are just saying that we need to make an effort to fix the actual problem (we don't have a small ISO for RHEL/CentOS that represents our strengths in containers), and that we should also be taking those steps in parallel.
_______________________________________________ Devtools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
