" If you mean either a computer or a pen will increase literacy because
these are tools that people use when they are learning by doing, that is
more complicated."

David,
I think that starting from the point that a lack of basic literacy means
that people cannot read and write at all is a false assumption. We can't
start at zero here, because functional illiteracy does not mean zero in my
view. More than likely we are talking about second or third grade levels,
with the possible exception of the ESL category.

So what we are really talking about is building on something that exists,
and self paced, and adaptive software can do this. The Jumpstart series is
very effective for children. It can also be done thru exposure to reading
and writing, albeit at a slower pace.

So in the end do I believe, and does my experience teach me, that providing
a computer and Internet access even absent direct instruction can improve
literacy? Absolutely!

Mike

Michael F. Pitsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Rosen
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 10:54 PM
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
Subject: Re: [DDN] NAAL points to serious,ongoing adult basic skills problem
in U.S.

Hello Mike,

I am not sure I understand what you mean.

If you mean a computer by itself won't increase literacy, just as a pen by
itself won't increase writing, I agree

If you mean either a computer or a pen will increase literacy because these
are tools that people use when they are learning by doing, that is more
complicated.  I agree that constructivist (project-based) and contextualized
learning are valuable approaches, and that in many  
instances they are the way that adults (especially) learn best.   
However, we are talking about basic literacy, that is adults who cannot
decode, who cannot get meaning from text.  They need instruction.  While
some computer-assisted instruction for adults may be valuable together with
direct instruction by a teacher or tutor, I am unaware of any research that
shows that adults learn to read, that is -- using the language of the NAAL
-- move from "below basic" to a "basic" level without the help of a trained
teacher or tutor.  I am also unaware of any argument that adults who cannot
read at all will learn to read simply because they have access to computers.
This was the point of my question. Has this argument been made, the argument
that adult literacy -- that is, basic literacy -- could be achieved simply
by increasing access to computers?  Apparently not.

Perhaps you meant something else.

Steve Eskow may be getting at the need for human teaching or tutoring when
he writes "It may be that other agencies, or even self- instruction, can
teach the young to operate the radio, television set, the cell phone, and
the computer, while we need schools to teach the far more difficult
technologies of deep reading and writing."  I would extend this observation
to adults who cannot read, that they need trained tutors or teachers.  I
would add that most adults need to learn how to use computers, too. And I
would add that they can learn basic literacy and how to use computers at the
same time,  as Toni Stone demonstrated so well in her book _Keystrokes to
Literacy_ and Steve Quann and Diana Satin demonstrate in their book about
immigrants learning English literacy, _Learning Computers, Speaking English_
( see http://wiki.literacytent.org/index.php/
AleTechnologyESOLComputerIntro for discussion about these books. )

David J. Rosen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Jan 4, 2006, at 9:53 AM, Executive Director wrote:

> " but I don't follow why one would think that access to computers and 
> the Internet would by itself result in increased basic literacy. "
>
> No more or less than one would think that reading books and writing 
> papers with a Bic word processor would improve basic literacy.
> Require that you subscribe to the theory that people learn by doing.
> Mike
> *************************
> Michael F. Pitsch
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_______________________________________________
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.

Reply via email to