On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:22 AM, bearophile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sean Kelly: >> Alternatives to core are: lang, d, base... But I like core the best so far. > > "d" is the name of the package my libs, so I hope you will use something > different :-) (But this isn't really much important).
I would have thought that having a 'd' as the name of a top-level package would make it impossible to use 'd' as a local identifier. Is that not so? Anyway, if you have to rename it then you'll be getting what you deserve from having the meglomania to use the name of the language as your package name. --bb
