Jason House wrote:
Sean Kelly Wrote:
Don wrote:
'std', 'stdc' and 'sys' sound OK to me. Although is there any reason why
stdc couldn't be part of 'sys'?
IMHO: 'common' sounds far too generic. 'core' is borderline.
My current thought is to have:
core/
stdc/
sys/posix
sys/windows
(yes, I'm planning to move posix support out of stdc)
Alternatives to core are: lang, d, base... But I like core the best so far.
What happens to the other parts of Phobos? Like others, I hope it will be ranamed from std to phobos.
That isn't something I can answer, though I'd expect Phobos to continue
using 'std'.
Sean
