Sean Kelly Wrote: > Don wrote: > > > > 'std', 'stdc' and 'sys' sound OK to me. Although is there any reason why > > stdc couldn't be part of 'sys'? > > IMHO: 'common' sounds far too generic. 'core' is borderline. > > My current thought is to have: > > core/ > stdc/ > sys/posix > sys/windows > > (yes, I'm planning to move posix support out of stdc) > > Alternatives to core are: lang, d, base... But I like core the best so far.
What happens to the other parts of Phobos? Like others, I hope it will be ranamed from std to phobos.
