On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:47:49 -0400, Jason House wrote: > Sean Kelly Wrote: > >> Don wrote: >> > >> > 'std', 'stdc' and 'sys' sound OK to me. Although is there any reason >> > why stdc couldn't be part of 'sys'? >> > IMHO: 'common' sounds far too generic. 'core' is borderline. >> >> My current thought is to have: >> >> core/ >> stdc/ >> sys/posix >> sys/windows >> >> (yes, I'm planning to move posix support out of stdc) >> >> Alternatives to core are: lang, d, base... But I like core the best so >> far. > > What happens to the other parts of Phobos? Like others, I hope it will > be ranamed from std to phobos.
Would be nice no have std renamed to phobos. This would enable a common ground and just looks well designed. It would also remove confusion for newcomers (why is std also named phobos?). But I don't think this will happen... (...and tango should be renamed to deimos, so both can circle around mars - just kidding)
