Sergey Gromov wrote:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:56:30 +0200,
Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
In any case, a hierarchy of the type
common/
core/
sys/
stdc/
should be highly considered. This would allow a namespace for functionality
that is truly common, not only the runtime, but math and eventually other
functionality. In addition it is naive to believe that just because
druntime is meant to be a common runtime, that it will be the only runtime
in the long run.
There is no 'truly common' functionality beyond the absolutely necessary
core runtime. The fact that Phobos and Tango share some code only means
that such code is ought to be in any stand-alone, general-purpose
library. Not that it must be built-in.
??? Don't understand.
Are you simply saying that there's no need for standard libraries?
