Am 17.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2013-10-17 11:33, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
There has been another important change that requires existing packages
to be updated: All packages must now have the fields "description" and
"license" present to be published. The license field has to be set
according to the specification . All existing branches and version
tags stay unaffected by this requirement and are still available.
Perhaps add the license: Apple Public Source License. This can be useful
for creating bindings to Apple specific libraries. Is there a
corresponding license for Microsoft?
Added APSL-2.0 (Apple Public Source License) and MS-PL (Microsoft Public