The only license JSON that looks valid is the string. Simple bracketing
will suffice for complex licenses.
On 17 Oct 2013 16:05, "Sönke Ludwig" <> wrote:

> Am 17.10.2013 15:28, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
>> On 2013-10-17 14:33, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>>  "dub publish" sounds like something that may considerably increase the
>>> complexity of the command line tool, especially in the long term, and it
>>> also increases the coupling to the public registry, whereas now it just
>>> needs a very small HTTP API that can be fulfilled by any HTTP file
>>> server. So I'd rather want to avoid that if possible.
>> You could have something like this:
>> dub publish <git-tag>
>> Should be much difference compare to how it works now. It would just
>> trigger the server to look for that tag, instead of doing it
>> automatically.
> Well, the other issue with that is that there is no guarantee that the
> server can fulfill the request in a timely manner. It may be busy getting
> information about other packages/tags/branches which makes it impossible to
> get direct feedback.
> What about an e-mail notification, though? Seems like the most natural
> channel.

Reply via email to