On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:22:41 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:58:33 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:54:17 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:

I could also argue that this issue is a with git requiring a
'git-' suffix on its scripts without providing users with some
means of overriding the file naming convention (maybe this is
already possible, I have only minimal git experience)!

BTW, git is not requiring a git- suffix, but a git-prefix. It does not matter for git what the git-<name here> script extension (or name) use.

It matters to the one typing git commands, because he has to type:

git <name here>

in order for git to invoke

git-<name here>


I really don't feel like git is doing anything bad here or it should change.

It matters, however, if one is allowed to type:

"git tellmethelotterynumbers"

instead of being forced to type

"git tellmethelotterynumbers.d"

You see, the latter version will give you the numbers spelled as:

16.d, 32.d, 18.d, 5.d, 11.d and 22.d

Or, it happens, the state lottery won't deny you the prize because, guess, the real numbers that were extracted were 16, 32, 18, 5, 11 and 22.

Reply via email to