On 1/21/14, 2:20 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Can we *please* have a well-established, useful, naming scheme for tags and
packages? 2.064beta3, 2.064beta4, 2.064.2, 2.065-b1... Are you as frustrated as
me?


I was just in the process of addressing this. Based on recent issues with using the packaging scripts, I've changed the naming convention as follows:

        #.###.b#    // beta
        #.###.rc#   // release candidate
        #.#.0       // release
        #.#.#       // hotfix (where last # != 0)

That should solve any issues you may have.

Reply via email to