On Thursday, 24 April 2014 at 14:10:07 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 24/04/14 09:19, Atila Neves wrote:
I did, yeah, that's why I asked that question recently about
calling D
from Ruby.
Right, that was you.
I also thought of using Thrift and played about with it but
in the end decided that the simplest option is to just use the
wire
protocol. It even reports back D exception information back,
so the only
real thing I can see that's missing is the snippet suggestions
when the
steps aren't defined yet.
If Ruby is embedded Cucumber could be embedded as well,
perhaps. Then you could get an executable without dependencies.
Or I could carry on implementing all the Cucumber features and
end up with an executable that does everything the Ruby version
does. I'm happy with what I've got now though, but the embedding
thing is interesting. I just decided that embedding was too much
work.
Atila
