On 8/20/14, 8:38 AM, safety0ff wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:18:46 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:14:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and declare it
yet another bug-fixing release.
Isn't this what point-releases are for, though?
I agree, I think 2.066.next should be the focus considering the known
issues of 2.066.
Fear not, point releases will address known deficiencies.
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 20:43:44 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
How is it decided when it's time to cut off a new release? Do we have
two RCs and that's it?
I find it hard to believe that it is just a coincidence that a surprise
release occurred on the same day as Java 9 and C++14 announcements.
Actually you can believe it. I am the one that called for the release
and it pay ZERO attention to those two languages with the mild exception
that when I have time I crack open a Java book to try to learn a little
programming.