On Thursday, 4 September 2014 at 10:39:34 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
On Thursday, 4 September 2014 at 05:58:19 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
Wouldn't it be better if all this functionality you build in a vim only solution be integrated into DCD instead? This way all sorts of compilers and maybe IDEs would benefit from it and AFAIK there is already a request for DCD to add dub support.

I already suggested it to Brian a year ago. That was his answer:

That was before DUB became the (de-facto) official build system so he might change his mind, but right now Dutyl actually


benefits from DCD's lack of DUB support, since it means you can rely on manual configured file for non-DUB projects.

I don't see why the manual configured file support needs to be removed if DCD would support dub.
Wouldn't it be possible to change it to a coexisting solution?

Reply via email to