On Monday, 2 February 2015 at 07:35:07 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-02-02 06:57, ketmar wrote:
dub is good, but only in limited use cases. so it's almost no
sense in
using dub if some use cases are not suitable for it: it's way
better to
adapt build tool that one already using (or write his own)
instead of use
TWO build tools for different projects.
Dub should have been two tools, one for package management and
one for building.
Indeed. Most of the issues I hear about stem from it trying to do
both at the same time. It's a good package manager but
unfortunately a not so good build system. This makes me think,
once more, of writing a D build system that uses dub only for
package dependencies.
Atila
