On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 08:35:07 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > On 2015-02-02 06:57, ketmar wrote: > >> dub is good, but only in limited use cases. so it's almost no sense in >> using dub if some use cases are not suitable for it: it's way better to >> adapt build tool that one already using (or write his own) instead of >> use TWO build tools for different projects. > > Dub should have been two tools, one for package management and one for > building.
i agree with you. the best thing of dub -- package management and dependency management -- should be easily accessible. something like "pkg- config", but with ability to download/install/uninstall/upgrade packages. i.e. pkg manager like "apt" ;-), plus "pkg-config" functionality to allow using in various build tools. but i think that it's too late now to separate this dub parts. :-(
Description: PGP signature