On 20 March 2015 at 00:45, Trent Forkert via Digitalmars-d-announce <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 11:18:29 UTC, Dicebot wrote: >> >> I call dub from makefile rules and feel pretty comfortable about such >> pattern (apart from being not-so-portable compared to raw dub). And building >> anything via IDE is just asking for trouble :) > > > I use Vim myself, but I think people who use IDEs would like to, well, use > IDEs. > >> Semantics analysis you can get by simply opening .d file in CDT project is >> very limited compared to opening dub project because it can't know the >> import paths for dependencies or pretty much anything about project >> structure apart from opened file. This isn't much. > > > It seems you are right that it *is* limited, but it shouldn't be. CMake > emits include/import paths into the project structure. I had thought it > emitted into .project, but evidently emits into .cproject. If DDT supported > a .dproject I could also emit, I could get it to work.
Precisely, I was expecting a .dproject file to appear, but it didn't. I also maintain the D (and Eclipse) support for premake (like cmake), but I can't support D in Eclipse like C/C++ as it is.
