On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 07:02:49 +0000, Atila Neves wrote:

> The binary backend isn't very good (it's probably as slow as make); I
> did the simplest thing that would work. I want to eventually optimise it
> so it's competitive with ninja and tup. But to do that I need to
> measure, and to do that I need to write the tup backend and a program to
> generate a synthetic project with thousands of files.

yet it's a good start anyway. i'm not using make, and don't want to 
install another build tool too. so binary that doesn't require any other 
tool is great addition.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to