On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 07:02:49 +0000, Atila Neves wrote: > The binary backend isn't very good (it's probably as slow as make); I > did the simplest thing that would work. I want to eventually optimise it > so it's competitive with ninja and tup. But to do that I need to > measure, and to do that I need to write the tup backend and a program to > generate a synthetic project with thousands of files.
yet it's a good start anyway. i'm not using make, and don't want to install another build tool too. so binary that doesn't require any other tool is great addition.
Description: PGP signature