On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:37:42 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:28:48 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote:
How do you see it?


Many variants are on the way.

The current logo is very good and there is value in keeping it. Now if it didn't have this extremely 90s-looking borders, it would be even better.


Also, change just for the sake of change is just bad strategy.

Do not make assumption on peoples opinion on "the need for change". The word here is not change as in literal "change", it means improvement :)

"Iron with steal, steel with gold, gold with diamond". Always room for improvement.

Reply via email to