On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei

A couple comments:
a) No mention of targeting increased organizational participation (academic, corporate, etc). Not trying to suggest it should or shouldn't be a goal. Just that if it is goal meaningful effort will be directed toward in H1 then it'd be worth including in the writeup.

b) More specificity in the roadmap and priorities, to the extent they are known - As a potential D adopter, it'd be useful to have better insight into where the language might be a year or two out. For example, what forms of C++ integration might be available, or if the major components of the standard library are likely to be available nogc. However, it's hard to discern this from the writeup. Perhaps in many cases it would be premature to establish such goals, but to the extent there has been concrete thought it'd be useful to write it up. This comment is similar to a number of others suggesting a preference for more concrete goals.


Reply via email to