On Wednesday, 25 May 2016 at 06:52:22 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Even faster then official version?What about futures, would it possible to make it's 100% compatibility with C version?
Not really.The reason why it is faster is because there is no indirection in working with the data. If I had full SQL support like there is in the C version, and you take that route rather then the direct access.
It will be as slow as the C version, and probably slower.