Am 08.06.2016 um 08:59 schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2016-06-07 20:42, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
No, it has to be the "+" variant (the first /+ +/ comment is evaluated).
That's unfortunate.
I generally really do appreciate your critique, but without backing
reasons it doesn't really have a constructive effect.
Two good properties about restricting to /+ +/ is that it's still
possible to put something else in front of it, and that it stands out
from the usual /* */ comments. Sure arguments can be made for supporting
all comment types, but it shouldn't be forgotten that in the end this is
a question of absolutely minimal impact.
Just to be clear: If anyone has a good argument for supporting more/all
comment types and there are no equally good arguments against it, please
go ahead and implement it and it will be included. Let's just make this
a quick decision, because changing it later on will mean breakage no
matter how it's done.
