On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 06:44:11 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
It would be nice to have the whole picture now, before
implementing DIP1000. Then it's possible to review them
together, making sure the end goal is actual possible to
achieve. Now we just have to trust Andrei and Walter that all
features will come together making the end goal possible. We've
already seen in the past that some features don't play well
It's also not possible/harder to come up with alternatives,
that might work better, if we don't have the whole picture.
I'm also not a big fan that the DIP is approved right from the
start. Then it's not a DIP, it's more of a FYI. It makes the
whole process kind of pointless since Andrei and Walter can
choose to ignore the feedback.
What he said !