On 2017-04-10 22:41, Atila Neves wrote:

It'll work, but it won't end up reporting it the same way. If you'd like
that to work seamlessly it's a question of having
`version(Have_unit_threaded)` (or however it is it's spelled) that
imports and throws `unit_threaded.should.UnitTestException`. Then Bob's
your uncle.


Ok, I see, thanks. On the other hand I just remembered that unit-threaded already have a very similar API for the assertions.

--
/Jacob Carlborg

Reply via email to