On 06/11/2017 4:59 PM, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 16:12:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote:

Even being the wrong Martin :-) I think the DUB registry really needs more and better filters, so that the gems inside can be found easily. (like: Number of Github stars, number of downloads, number of developers and in the future: money donated to this project ...).

There has been several attempts but I would like to encourage the D Foundation to put more focus on this. Better ecosystem around third party software means less work for improvement of standard lib.

Regards mt.

Agreed. (IMO more important than Elvis operator)


If the DIP is too complex or big, it will be getting a no from me.
I just don't see any of those extra syntaxes being discussed as useful.

Reply via email to