On Monday, 25 February 2019 at 18:51:17 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2019-02-24 11:46, Mike Parker wrote:
Walter and Andrei have requested the Final Review round be
dropped for DIP 1018, "The Copy Constructor", and have given
it their formal approval. They consider copy constructors a
critical feature for the language.
Walter provided feedback on Razvan's implementation. When it
reached a state with which he was satisfied, he gave the green
light for acceptance.
I think the process is flawed when not everyone plays by the
same rules.
From the process document:
“the DIP Manager or the Language Maintainers may allow for
exceptions which waive requirements or responsibilities at their
discretion.”
If you were to write a DIP for a feature they think important
enough, it could be fast tracked, too.
