On 2/25/19 9:26 PM, Manu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 12:20 PM Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
On 2/25/19 2:41 PM, bachmeier wrote:
On Monday, 25 February 2019 at 19:24:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
From the process document:
“the DIP Manager or the Language Maintainers may allow for exceptions
which waive requirements or responsibilities at their discretion.”
If you were to write a DIP for a feature they think important enough,
it could be fast tracked, too.
I hate to be so negative, but when I see D's corporate management
structure, the lack of community contribution is obvious. It doesn't
exactly motivate contributions. This is no way to run an open source
project. I understand that it works well for Facebook because everyone
on the team is paid six figures, and they can be replaced in two hours,
but an open source project is not Facebook.
I know the whole argument about why it is that way. That doesn't mean
it's going to work.
What do you recommend? Should we carry a final review here?
In my case, you could have produced useful and not-completely-wrong
rejection text with the rejection, and then not insulted me a few
times before eventually producing some actionable feedback.
I mean, its in your interest to foster contribution, not repel it.
I apologize again for my use of unkind words. If there's something else
I can do to atone, please let me know.
