On 2/25/2019 10:44 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/25/19 1:39 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2019-02-25 17:31, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The proposers (Razvan and myself) and Walter (the reviewer) do not know how
to make DIP 1018 better.
That shouldn't justify accepting a DIP that might contain problems.
Definitely.
But of course, if you don't think there are any problems.
Not talking for Walter, but generally acceptance implies that.
I can't guarantee there aren't problems (bugs) in the DIP, but I didn't find any
more (the ones I did find Razvan fixed). If you're familiar with the C++ copy
ctor, it is very similar, lending credence to the notion that there isn't a big
problem left.
Regardless, we need to move forward with this, not wring hands wondering what
to do.
