On Thursday, 21 May 2020 at 16:32:32 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 21 May 2020 at 16:14:02 UTC, Seb wrote:
Why we can't we have a technical board where the community can
vote in experts and potentially companies could even buy a
seat for $$$ which would mean a lot more for them than the
current very vague sponsorship options.
ditto, I think we should have like a seven person elected DIP
committee who pass/fail things by majority vote. It is obvious
to me that the current process is totally useless.
Exactly and I even remember there was even a discussion about
this on reddit (/r/programming) sometime ago where someone was
pointing the flaws on D, and someone said the DIP process was one
of them, and there were some known people around here replying
that comment saying it was not the case.
The discussion topic about this DIP
(https://forum.dlang.org/thread/[email protected]) had 210 replies, some concerns and in the end was ACCEPT WITHOUT ANY COMMENT.
This is what I call a waste of everybody's time.
SG.
