On Thursday, 21 May 2020 at 16:32:32 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 21 May 2020 at 16:14:02 UTC, Seb wrote:
Why we can't we have a technical board where the community can
vote in experts and potentially companies could even buy a
seat for $$$ which would mean a lot more for them than the
current very vague sponsorship options.
ditto, I think we should have like a seven person elected DIP
committee who pass/fail things by majority vote. It is obvious
to me that the current process is totally useless.
As noted earlier, I'm with Steve, Seb, Adam, and "everyone but
Walter" as far as I can see. If this stands we'll have gone from
@safe meaning "the compiler is responsible" to "the compiler
can't guarantee anything unless you're pure D all the way down".
Atila, what's your take on all this? Is it fork time?
