On 26.04.2011 21:10, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > It's a bad idea to statically link libc. This is from the glibc maintainer:
Well, I would say - bad idea to statically link glibc, but there are alternatives (mentioned previously uClibc). Good point from the link: "...more efficient use of physical memory. All processes share the same physical pages for the code in the DSOs." makes me wonder, when druntime/phobos will be in DSO? ;) /Alexander
