On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 21:46:45 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 21:39:54 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
It's always true, because I explicitly wrote *might*, not
*will*, to indicate that it depends on your use case. Your
example is a common use case where you can't skip the check.
Programmers and their tight-binding logic...
- Honey, please buy a loaf of bread. If there are eggs, buy a
dozen.
...
- Hello, do you have eggs?
- Yes.
- Dozen loaves of bread, please.
;)
That usually happens when two sides interpret an ambiguous
statement ;)
