On Friday, 4 January 2019 at 00:19:05 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Friday, 4 January 2019 at 00:15:28 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2019 23:44:15 +0000, Alex wrote:
I assume that is another bug and has nothing to do with
interfaces...
B.foo is both overriding A.foo and implementing D.foo, so
that's not a bug.
I don't have any interfaces in my example.
B.foo overrides A.foo. By casting a B object to be an A object,
A's behavior should be granted, shouldn't it?
No, because you OVERRIDE A's foo().
A does not exist. A is B and when you cast B to A you just tell
the compiler that the reference should only have A's signature
available.
You're not assigning B to A.
