On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 20:18:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 9/23/13 1:04 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 9/23/2013 10:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm unclear on what void[] means starting from its semantics.
I agree that it should be void[], as that represents (in D) a
block of
untyped data. void[] should be ideal for a primitive allocator.
Great, made that change, it all works. Does void[] make any
promise about alignment?
Andrei
void[] dont make any promise about anything, that is the whole
point.
