On 9/23/13 1:04 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 9/23/2013 10:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:I'm unclear on what void[] means starting from its semantics.I agree that it should be void[], as that represents (in D) a block of untyped data. void[] should be ideal for a primitive allocator.
Great, made that change, it all works. Does void[] make any promise about alignment?
Andrei
