V Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:43:52 +0000 Chris via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> napsáno:
> On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 12:29:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg > wrote: > > On 2015-11-25 11:17, Suliman wrote: > >> [...] > > > > BTW, why was not TOML [1] chosen? I know it was discussed but I > > can't remember why SDL was preferred. I think TOML is more > > widely used than SDL [2]. GitLib CI multi runner is also using > > it. > > > > [1] https://github.com/toml-lang/toml > > [2] https://github.com/toml-lang/toml#projects-using-toml > > TOML looks nice, _but_ it's version 0.4.0. We cannot afford to > maintain a parser for a format that hasn't "settled down" yet. Ok, but we can afford to mantain a parser for a dead format? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Simple_Declarative_Language
