On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 22:27:08 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 20:56:04 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 26/11/2015 12:53, Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d wrote:
V Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:43:52 +0000
Chris via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> napsáno:
On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 12:29:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
[...]
TOML looks nice, _but_ it's version 0.4.0. We cannot afford
to
maintain a parser for a format that hasn't "settled down"
yet.
Ok, but we can afford to mantain a parser for a dead format?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Simple_Declarative_Language
BAM!! *Daniel drops mike, walks way*
(well said)
Isn't it easier to maintain a parser for a dead format than a
living one? You know it won't change ... after all, its dead!
Err, that's what I thought too. It won't change anymore, if it's
dead, right? Also, in the case of SDL, the parser has already
been written, for better or worse. But in the case of TOML, time
would be spent on _yet another markup language_, and for what?
Once D takes off we can think about these things. Atm, they're
not really important. Our house doesn't stand properly yet and
we're discussing effin bikesheds.
