On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 13:10:30 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 12:43:54 UTC, Chris wrote:
TOML looks nice, _but_ it's version 0.4.0. We cannot afford to
maintain a parser for a format that hasn't "settled down" yet.
Why not use a well defined subset of YAML then?
I really think that small subset of YAML would be very good
solution. It's easy to read and easy to write. DUB do not have
full implement it. Just some basic things.
TOML is harder to read, and write bu hands.
